| HOME | Areas of Practice | Newsletter | Question of the Week | News Articles | Contact Us |
| ATTORNEYS James F. Bishop · Melinda Appelman · Ronald R. Inderbitzin |
|
· Bankruptcy · Business and Transactional Law · Civil and Commerical Litigation · Criminal, DUI, Traffic and Juvenile Law · Corporate and Partnership Law · Family Law · Firearms Law · Health, Food Service and Liquor Licensing Law · Personal Injury · Real Estate and Environmental Law · Wills and Trusts |
. |
Areas of Practice > Civil and Commercial Litigation
Litigation is the curse of the judicial system. It is
time consuming, tedious, exorbitantly expensive, but at times, absolutely
necessary. Our firm practices law in a manner to keep clients out of
litigation, but we are brought matters which require litigation skills and
the dedication to follow through.
We provide a full range of litigation services in the Courts of the State
of Illinois. Though admitted to the Federal Courts we choose not to handle
matters requiring an appearance in the District Courts. We appear daily in
the 19th Judicial Circuit, McHenry County and, as necessary in Lake, Kane,
Cook, Boone and Winnebago Counties.
Perhaps, the best evidence of our litigation skills can be determined by a
listing of some of the cases in which the firm has participated in the
Appellate Court of the State. The following list summarizes appeals
handled by the firm from the trial court through the Appellate Court
decision. Copies of decisions are available by requesting a copy from us.
List of Appellate Court Decisions
Civil Aeronautics Board, Plaintiff v. Tour Travel Enterprises, Inc., Defendants Appellees
Interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s
order establishing priorities to be followed in disbursing funds from an
escrow account. Vacated and remanded.
Forcible detainer action affirming possession to
plaintiff and vacating trial court’s decision with regard to serious title
dispute being decided in summary action.
Trial court entered a temporary restraining order
enjoining McHenry County Board and it’s Regional Pollution Control Board
Siting Committee from holding siting hearings relating to a proposed
sanitary landfill. In interlocutory appeal, the Appellate Court reversed
the trial court and remanded for further proceedings.
On appeal, decision of trial court affirmed establishing
rule of law that Governmental Tort Immunity Act renders municipalities
immune from damages occasioned by issuance of wrongful preliminary
injunction.
Defendant convicted by trial court of violating county
noise ordinance. On appeal, judgment of Circuit Court reversed. April 11,
1989. Rule 23 order.
School districts appealed IPTAB’s decision as to the
assessed valuation of taxpayers properties for years 1987-90. On appeal,
decision of IPTAB affirmed. Rule 23 order.
School districts appealed IPTAB’s decision as to the
assessed valuation of taxpayers properties for years 1992-1994. On appeal,
decision of IPTAB affirmed. Rule 23 order.
Trial court dismissed plaintiff’s amended complaint for
failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, trial court reversed and
remanded.
Trial court found defendant guilty of domestic battery. On appeal, appellant raised issues
concerning wife's claiming of 5th Amendment and trial courts ruling with respect to excited
utterance doctrine. Trial court reversed with respect to excited utterance ruling, case remanded.
On remand, case nolle prossed.
Trial Court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff, Pennington, for possession of property and
$3,000. Court also entered judgment in favor of defendant, Stromdale, on his purported counterclaim,
against plaintiff for $22,354.48. On appeal, plaintiff argued that the trial court was in error in
allowing the defendant to plead the counterclaim in the forcible entry and detainer action. The
Appellate Court reversed the trial court and ordered defendant's judgment for $22,354.48 to be
vacated and set aside.
|
|
© Copyright 2002 James F. Bishop & Associates. All rights reserved. Web Site by Baldwin Web Design |